I know, it is too early for porn. You have scarcely digested your news-foods and morning coffee. Nonetheless, here we are, wondering where the good sexy stuff is. Well, it so happens that my friend Megan is a longtime editor of such things. What is it like to be living the dream? I decided to ask her.
1. What is the official editorial name for this stuff you edit?
Romance and erotica. There are subcategories (Romantic Suspense, Erotic Fantasy, etc.) but you can pretty much sum it up as romance and erotica. Erotica is usually more explicit, but the line between the two seems to be blurring more and more. I’d say, in general, romance has sex scenes in service to the plot, and erotica has a plot in order to facilitate sex scenes.
2. Last we talked about, er, things, you mentioned there was a tendency for authors to animate just about any object so that someone could have sex with it. Could you comment on some of the more egregious examples?
I don’t remember this conversation, so I’m not sure. I heard a story from an editor about a book where there was a computer or something that was sentient so the character could have sex with it? I’m a little fuzzy on remembering the details.
I haven’t come across a lot of object-sex, but I have seen a lot of supernatural scenarios – werewolves, vampires, mermaids (which creates interesting logistical issues), were-lions, were-tigers, were-rats, were-anything really. Laurell K. Hamilton is probably the queen of that genre. She started with vampires, then werewolves, and now the world of her books contains pretty much any half-human, half-animal combo you could think of. There was even a were-swan at one point. That human/animal combo seems to be the trend in the books I work on. It lends itself to a pretty easy “the beast within” metaphor. And vampires are still pretty popular across the board.
3. I know this goes against my protocol, but what was the all-time worst porn-type thingee you had to edit and why?
I don’t want to offend any authors/fans, so I won’t get into too many details, but there are two that stand out. One is the all-time worst just because it was a bad book; poorly written, unsexy-sex scenes, grammar and tense problems across the board, a plot that didn’t even make the barest of sense. I’d qualify that as the worst because of the quality. It was just too distractingly bad to be good escapism.
But in terms of bad porn, it was one of the first erotica books I worked on. It was short stories that all involved the same fetish, something that could be considered degrading by some people. The stories might have been fine individually or in small doses, but I ended up doing the whole project in a few days, and it was just too much. Whereas a lot of the erotica is written from a kind of joyful perspective of sex and romance (characters still tend to end up in stable domestic situations at the end, whether that’s married or in a functional foursome; it’s still the stereotypical “happy ending”), these fetish stories were a pretty dark perspective on the whole thing, at least to me. At the end of that project I just kind of felt sad for people.
4. Can you describe some of the many delightful sub-genres out there for different audiences? You know truckers, receptionists, televangelists…
There aren’t official sub-genres, but there are definitely audiences being written for. When I first started my job we worked on a series of western novels with the typical adventure and sex combo that were described to me as “porn for prisoners and truckers.” I told this to a male friend who asked, “Isn’t porn the porn for truckers?” Another male friend told me that he remembered those westerns as his coming-of-age moment, thinking he was picking up a book about gunslingers and ending up with barmaid sex scenes.
The boundaries between what makes a romance or erotica novel versus a fantasy novel or fiction novel with sexual elements is interesting though. I’m not privy to how those decisions get made, but it seems like a marketing issue. In the same way that “chick lit” was a big deal ten years ago and now no one uses that term. What can we call it to market it to the group of people who would be most interested in this story. I’d assume the usual stereotypes are in place with this genre – that guys aren’t reading a bunch of erotica novels or Victorian-era romances; that women aren’t picking up the dirty westerns. But I don’t know what the sales statistics are on any of these.
The interesting thing to me is what people are writing about and how the bar gets raised. The first few books I worked on seem tame now compared to some of the current books. There might have been a story of a woman torn between two men, and her sexual adventures with both, before she chooses one and there’s a happy ending resolution. Now I’ve worked on at least two books that have ended with the characters in polyamorous relationships, and totally happy about it. And these are pretty mainstream books and authors.
5. Ok, let’s get down to it. Where is the good stuff? Who is writing it, why read it and where can we find it?
You can get all the books I’ve worked on at major chain bookstores, and there’s usually some kind of Adult or Erotica section at B&N or wherever. As for why read it, I guess why not? At my ten year high school reunion a number of old classmates couldn’t stop talking about how much they liked this series or that series when I told them what I did for a living. And then a few got into a little too much detail about how the books had spiced up their marriages. So there’s that. At their best, I think the genres just like any other: a good book, at minimum, lets you escape into another world for awhile, and why not a sexy world as much as a romantic world as much as an alien world as much as an intellectual world? A good story’s a good story.
My favorite romance series is by Claudia Dain (“The Courtesan’s Wager,” “The Courtesan’s Daughter,” etc.). The series takes place in London in the 19th century, and the books are completely cheeky and intentionally hysterical. Dain has a really good ear for the dialogue and details of the time, and there are laugh-out-loud parts in them. Because they’re time-specific, they are pretty chaste as far as romance goes, but the double entrendres and the saucy dialogue seem, weirdly, naughtier than the more modern explicit stuff.
For the explicit stuff, some of the Susan Johnson books are pretty engaging, writing-wise, but they are incredibly explicit. If someone wants down and dirty reading, that would be the way to go. Emma Holly is pretty readable, and often classified as romance, but it’s pretty envelope pushing and I think she might do some erotica too. Honestly though, the erotica books all start to blend together for me. I don’t really remember who does what series or what the plot points were or the writing quality was after the job’s done.
This isn’t a romance or erotica genre, but Charlaine Harris’s Southern Vampire series (what the HBO show “True Blood” is based on) is great. It’s usually listed as Fantasy or Horror, but it has all the hallmarks of some of the good romance books – lots of well-written sex scenes amid just a generally engaging plot and all around good writing. Plus, you know. Vampires and werewolves and all sorts of things that go bump in the night. But sexed up.
6. Is your job fun? Do you sit around fluffed up and titillated all day or might you just as well be editing computer manuals?
Well it’s not like editing computer manuals, that’s for sure – you are reading romance novels. What that means for how enjoyable it is really comes down to how good of a storyteller the author is. There are some books that are a chore to get through, and it doesn’t matter how many sex scenes there are or how creative the set up is – the writing is just tedious and boring and it’s a chore. But there are other books that are well done, with writing that zings through or characters that are developed well enough that you’re engaged in the story. That’s when it’s fun and titillating, because the author’s done their job as an author, and created a realistic cast and world. Even if that means sexy sexy vampires.

Megan Gerrity is an editor, writer and radio commentator. Listen to her three recent pieces created for the public radio show, The Lake Effect, in Milwaukee:
On being a Roller Derby crush
Writing a novel in a month
And why she is excited about the start of baseball season
Also, check out Megan’s blog about picking yourself up and moving on.